Now accepting new clients! Get Started

Tax Glossary

What Are the At-Risk Rules?

At-risk rules limit deductible losses to amounts a taxpayer can economically lose. Learn what counts, debt exceptions, ordering, and carryovers.

The at-risk rules generally limit a taxpayer's deductible loss from an activity to the amount the taxpayer could actually lose economically in that activity. Amounts contributed, qualifying debt, income retained in the activity, withdrawals, prior losses, guarantees, and protection against loss can all affect the calculation.

At-risk amount is not the same as tax basis, equity on a balance sheet, property value, loan balance, or cash invested. A taxpayer may have basis but not be at risk, especially when financing is nonrecourse, guaranteed by another person, borrowed from someone with an interest in the activity, or protected by reimbursement, insurance, a stop-loss agreement, or a similar arrangement.

Activities subject to the rules

At-risk limitations commonly apply to individuals and certain closely held corporations engaged in activities such as holding real property, equipment leasing, farming, natural-resource activities, and other trades or businesses or income-producing ventures. The calculation is generally made separately for each activity, subject to aggregation rules.

The rules limit losses, not gross income. They do not decide whether an expense is ordinary and necessary, whether property must be capitalized, whether the taxpayer materially participates, or whether the activity is operated for profit. Those questions are resolved under separate provisions.

What generally increases the amount at risk?

A taxpayer's amount at risk may include:

  • Cash and adjusted basis of property contributed to the activity
  • Amounts borrowed for use in the activity when the taxpayer is personally liable for repayment
  • Certain qualified nonrecourse financing secured by real property
  • The taxpayer's share of activity income that remains invested

Qualified nonrecourse financing is an important real-estate exception, but it has detailed requirements involving the lender, security, purpose, and borrower. Ordinary nonrecourse debt does not become at risk merely because it increases property basis. Seller financing, related-party loans, guarantees, and refinancing require careful review.

What reduces or fails to create at-risk amount?

Prior deductible losses, distributions, withdrawals, debt repayment, property withdrawals, and reductions in qualifying liabilities can decrease the amount at risk. Amounts protected against loss generally do not count. Protection can be explicit or inferred from the arrangement's economic substance.

A loan guarantee does not always create at-risk amount when signed. Depending on the structure and entity, the guarantor may not become economically out of pocket until payment is made. Partnership basis rules and at-risk rules must therefore be calculated separately rather than treating a K-1 liability allocation as conclusive.

Example: basis and at-risk limits differ

Assume a taxpayer has $60,000 of tax basis in a rental activity but only $35,000 at risk because $25,000 of basis comes from financing that does not qualify for at-risk treatment. The activity produces a $50,000 otherwise allowable loss.

The basis limitation permits up to $50,000 because basis is $60,000. The at-risk rules then allow only $35,000. The remaining $15,000 is suspended under the at-risk rules. Only the $35,000 that survives that step proceeds to the passive-activity analysis.

If passive income or the rental-real-estate special allowance permits only $10,000, then the carryforwards are:

  • $15,000 suspended under the at-risk rules
  • $25,000 suspended under the passive-activity rules

Those amounts are not one interchangeable pool. Future increases are tested in the proper order and each carryforward retains its source.

Ordering of loss limitations

For a pass-through interest, the practical order is generally:

  1. Determine whether the expense or loss is otherwise allowable.
  2. Apply entity and owner basis limitations.
  3. Apply the at-risk rules.
  4. Apply passive activity loss limitations.
  5. Apply the excess business loss limitation and other applicable rules.

An amount disallowed at an earlier step is not included in a later limitation calculation for that year. Good workpapers track basis-suspended, at-risk-suspended, passive-suspended, and excess-business-loss amounts separately.

Form 6198 and reporting

Individuals, estates, trusts, and certain closely held C corporations may use Form 6198 to calculate an at-risk limitation. The allowed loss then flows to Form 8582 if the activity is passive. Schedule E, Schedule C, Schedule F, Form 4797, or a K-1-related form may contain the underlying activity amounts.

Form 6198 is a limitation form, not a replacement for the activity schedule. A taxpayer may need one Form 6198 for each activity unless aggregation rules permit a different treatment.

Recapture when the amount at risk becomes negative

If distributions, liability changes, loss protection, or other events reduce the taxpayer's amount at risk below zero after prior losses were allowed, recapture may be required. The taxpayer may have to recognize income to the extent of the negative amount, generally limited by prior deductions under the at-risk rules. Later increases can affect the treatment of previously suspended losses.

A sale does not automatically free an at-risk carryforward in the same way a qualifying complete disposition can release a passive-loss carryforward. The taxpayer must separately determine basis, amount at risk, gain or loss, passive treatment, and any recapture.

California treatment

California applies at-risk limitations and provides Form FTB 6198 for individuals and related taxpayers. California also directs taxpayers to apply the at-risk rules before passive activity loss rules and before the excess business loss limitation. State basis and depreciation differences can create a California at-risk result that differs from the federal result.

Common mistakes

  • Treating basis and amount at risk as identical
  • Counting all nonrecourse financing as at risk
  • Assuming a guarantee immediately creates an at-risk amount
  • Ignoring loss-protection agreements or related-party financing
  • Combining basis-, at-risk-, and passive-suspended losses in one balance
  • Applying Form 8582 before the at-risk limitation
  • Assuming a disposition automatically releases every type of suspended loss
Heath Income Tax

Heath Income Tax can help separate basis, at-risk, passive, and California carryforwards and document the financing behind each limitation.

Frequently asked questions

Can qualified nonrecourse real-estate financing count?

Yes, qualifying financing secured by real property may count, but only when the statutory lender, security, and other requirements are met.

Do suspended at-risk losses expire?

They generally carry forward while the taxpayer remains subject to the rules and may become deductible when the amount at risk increases, subject to later limitations.

Is a down payment always at risk?

Cash genuinely contributed and exposed to loss ordinarily increases the amount, but reimbursement rights, protected arrangements, and the source of borrowed funds can change the answer.

Related terms

Official sources

The definitions and examples on this page are for informational purposes only and do not constitute tax advice. Tax laws change frequently and individual circumstances vary. Consult a qualified tax professional before making decisions based on this content.